Is There Another Cuban Missile Crisis In The Offing?

You are already Here! Don’t leave without Like, Share, Commenting, or Tweet…be the Voice of the Free Press!!

EDITORIAL: By Saeed Naqvi, Copy Edited by Adam Rizvi, TIO: Is another Cuban missile crisis in the works? The agreement between Nicaragua to post Russian soldiers in the communist country must disturb Washington. What happens to the Monroe doctrine which Trump’s Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson announced: “was alive and kicking today”. Will Biden’s Secretary of State repudiate this?

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Russian Invasion: Ukraine Muslims are Askew  

Cardinal Ovando Bravo, if he is still around, must be in a state of feverish anxiety. When I visited Nicaragua’s capital Managua in the 90s, when was just about to be crowned President, the venerable cardinal virtually led me by the hand to Mother Mary’s statue in Central Managua so that I could see the miracle with my own two eyes: Mary was weeping copious tears because the communist rule was imminent. It reminds me now of another miracle that gripped India in 1995: Ganesh statues slurping vast quantities of milk.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Putin’s Adviser: Sanctions Hitting Europe More Because US Wants It Weakened

The Nicaragua agreement has been given vast amplitude: seven Latin American countries “to enter the country and participate”, says Fox News. There was more for Washington to worry about. This time the salvo comes from cardinal Bravo’s supreme boss. Pope Francis rubbished the diligently orchestrated western propaganda that Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine was “unprovoked”?

In an interview with a Jesuit magazine, the Pope quotes a “wise head of state” who had predicted much before the invasion that “they are barking at the gates of Russia; the situation could lead to war.”

The Cuban Missile Crisis

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Evolving Security Dynamic in West Asia and India’s Challenges

There is no great difference between what the statesman said and what the Pope said some weeks ago. He said NATO may have “facilitated” Kremlin’s invasion by “barking” at the Russian door.

That Russia was consistently “provoked” has been clear as daylight since 1998 when the US Senate voted in favor of NATO expansion. The wisest historian of Russia, the one who invented a policy of containing the Soviet Union, George Kennan, announced loud and clear “There will be repercussions.”

Also Read, Tweet & Share: India: Use of Facial Recognition Technologies (FRTs) in Policing.

At the 2008 Bucharest summit of NATO, to which ironically Putin was also invited, Georgia’s and Ukraine’s possible entry into the fold was announced. It turned out to be a dramatic summit because President G.W. Bush was also in attendance, lobbying like there will be no tomorrow for Georgia and Ukraine to be ushered into NATO. “This would be like a knife on my throat,” said Putin. What was suggested, Putin said, was an existential threat to Russia. A deep, dark red line was drawn.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Trigs on Track-Diplomacy Unwound -The Ukrainian Crisis

2008 was memorable for two events: the Russia-Georgia war which Russia won and the collapse of Lehman Brothers with a $619 billion record debt which hit the US where it hurts most. The expression “US decline” gained currency since this event. It was a dramatic turn of fortune: 1990-91 Soviet collapse brought about the “sole superpower” moment. Whoever imagined that the contradictions of capitalism would catch up with the world’s most powerful economy and make it look weak-kneed in the boxing ring.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: India and the Arab world Protests, Will it Lead To Something New?

During the West’s build-up to the Ukraine expedition, I had pointed out flaws in the strategy because three of the US’s earlier expeditions, which I had watched from close, had failed. After 20 years of occupation, the US left Afghanistan in disorder and unspeakable hunger. On April 3, 2002, it occupied Iraq, for a decade, with gains hard to see unless you see things from the Israeli perspective.

Then the US brought Syria into its focus with an altered strategy. It would not occupy this time but allow Gulf countries, scared of Iran, to break the Shia axis in order to place the knife on Iran’s throat which remains the existential threat for Israel and a fickle cast of characters leading the Gulf States.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Ukraine: Examples Of Media Disinformation From Previous Wars

When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, with an imperious wave of the hand, demanded “Assad, get out of the way”, I was moved to question her cocksure demeanor indicating regime change. Within days Assad would fall. The gist of my logic was this: when you failed in Afghanistan and Iraq with extended spells of occupation, where do you derive your certitude from that Assad would full by what looked to me like cross-border terrorism. I can never forget the image of Gen. Lloyd Austin, much before he became Defence Secretary, among whose various tasks was to train “good militants” to plague Assad. A budget of $500 million was set aside. The “good” militant learned all the drills and, one morning collected all the weapons they had been trained to handle and walked away presumably to join the “bad” terrorists. The General had to face the Senate Armed Services Committee. “How many of the soldiers you trained are still in battle?” the General looked at the panel with sad eyes, “four or five”.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: What Is At The Heart of Ukraine Story?

If Assad could not fall by external pick prick, how did you dream up a proxy war on the turf of Ukraine which would defeat Putin with his arsenal of thousands of nuclear weapons. You have caused the destruction of Ukraine with your weapons because you wished to get at Putin’s jugular. But why do you wish to “weaken Russia” as Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin or “debase Putin”? In an earlier instance also you played this kind of Billiard: your eventual target was Iran but Syria leading the subsidiary Shia arc stood in the way.

In the instance of Ukraine, you are having kittens because China, your eventual target, has held Russia’s hand and announced a “friendship with no limits”. Your hope is that a “debased” Russia will be that much less attractive to China. It is like throwing acid on a woman’s face so that the bridegroom rejects her.

Also, Read, Tweet & Share: Are Fears Of False Flag In Ukraine Credible?

One would have watched the outcome with interest because the complete devastation of Ukraine is not in anyone’s interest. But alas your own allies are undermining your war effort. The unofficial line to all “European officials is to accelerate trade with Russia in food grains, fertilizers, oil, and gas.” Your media too has fallen silent. Have they seen the writing on the wall?

Also, Read more from this Author: India and the Arab world Protests, Will it Lead To Something New?+0

Curated and Compiled by Humra Kidwai

Saeed Naqvi

Saeed Naqvi

Saeed Naqvi is a senior Indian journalist, television commentator, interviewer. He has interviewed world leaders and personalities in India and abroad, which appear in newspapers, magazines and on national television, remained editor of the World Report, a syndication service on foreign affairs, and has written for several publications, both global and Indian, including the BBC News, The Sunday Observer, The Sunday Times, The Guardian, Washington Post, The Indian Express, The Citizen and Outlook magazine. At the Indian Express, he started in 1977 as a Special Correspondent and eventually becoming, editor, Indian Express, Madras, (1979–1984), and Foreign Editor, The Indian Express, Delhi in 1984, and continues to writes columns and features for the paper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *