Press Council of India and Center’s Response Sought on Media Coverage of Tabligi Incident

Share, Like, Subscribe, Follow…be the Voice Of Free Press

By Syed Ali Mujtaba, Copy Edited By Jibran Khan, TIO:  A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde, Justices L Nageswara Rao and M M Shantanagoudar, asked the Press Council of India and Centre to place their response within two weeks about the action taken against media communalizing the Nizamuddin Tablighi Jamat Markaz issue in March 2020.

The case was heard through video conferencing on Wednesday, May 27, 2020.

The court asked the Press Council of India (PCI) whether TV channels broadcasting allegedly communally sensitive news did any violation of the Cable TV (Regulation) Act of 1995?

‘What action did the PCI initiate against certain sections of print and electronic media on allegations of communalization of the Markaz issue,’ the court asked?

Also, Read: India-China Showdown in LADAK looks imminent

On the allegations of circulation of Fake News by certain sections of print and electronic media on the Markaz issue, the Court asked the Press Council of India (PCI), whether it had initiated any action against them?

The bench asked the Central government what measures it had taken to ensure that the public isn’t instigated that may later become a law and order problem?

The court also asked the Central government to respond to the plea seeking a probe into the circumstances leading to the holding of the Tablighi Jamaat convention in Delhi in March.

The court wished to know whether the Markaz of the Tablighi Jamaat alone was responsible for the convention or the government had any role in permitting the foreigners to attend the function. What prevented the government from stopping the convention, when the government had the knowledge of COVID-19 spread?

Also, Read: Tablighi Jamaat Markaz, One Of the World’s Biggest Arduous  Movements

Senior advocate, Dushyant Dave arguing for the plaintiff said, that this is a grave issue impacting minority rights. It makes out an offense under the law.  This is a serious matter. It requires the court’s intervention and appropriate action, Dave said.

He added; certain sections of print and electronic media indulged in communalization of the Nizamuddin Markaz issue. It circulated a lot of fake news, which was misleading and damaging the social fabric of the nation.  Why is the government silent?

The bench then ordered to implead the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) as a party respondent and scheduled the hearing after two weeks.

Also, Read: A dash of humour to score political brownie points

Earlier, on Monday, April 13, 2020, the Supreme Court had agreed to hear the petitions filed by the JamiatUlama-i-Hind and others seeking a direction to stop the media from communalizing the Tablighi Jamaat incident linking it to COVID-19 infection.

The Apex Court had asked the petitioners to impaled the Press Council of India (PCI) as a party to the case and posted it for hearing after two weeks.

Also, Read: Democratic Candidates, It’s Time for you to Talk About the Muslim Ban.

The court at that time did not pass any interim order and wanted the Press Council of India (PCI) to be impaled in the case.

The court said; “We want to make solid long term measures about the news items as it is a question of larger reporting. Once we take cognizance of everything, people will understand.”   The case then was also heard through video-conferencing.

Also, Read: Will hospitals run out of beds…

Also, Read: Migrant exodus puts India on the road, in reverse gear

Also, Read: In hating me, Oppn has started to hate nation: PM Modi

 Syed Ali Mujtaba is a journalist based in Chennai. He can be contacted at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *