Dara Shikoh is Our Hero; Let Ram be Yours

You are Here: Tweet, Like, Share, Comment, Subscribe…be the Voice of Free Press!

From Saeed Naqvi’s book: “Reflections of an Indian Muslim” 1993

The India observer, TIO, NJ: The entrance to Keshav Kunj, the four-storeyed office of the RSS in New Delhi, is past the most congested streets of Karol Bagh facing the Jhandewalan temple. It was on the first floor living room of this building where I met Mr Bhaurao Deoras, 75.

Mr Deoras joined the RSS soon after it was founded in 1925. Though H.S. Hedgewar was the spirit behind the founding of the organisation, it was M.S. Golwalkar who built the RSS as a nation-wide organisation of lathi-weilding, aggressive Hindus. His book ‘Bunch of Thoughts’ drew inspiration from Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: RSS procession in the state: TN government to appeal against Madras HC order

The RSS claims to have more than 18 lakh cadres and 37 front organisations, spread all over the country. Mr Balasaheb Deoras, the elder brother of Bhaurao Deoras, is the Sarsanghchalak of the pyramidical organizational structure.

Since Mr Balasaheb Deoras had been ailing for the past few months, Bhaurao emerged as the next important RSS leader who was primarily responsible for coordinating the RSS’s relations with the BJP and other political parties.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: RSS: New Book Warns Dangers to Indian Constitution and Federalism

The two-hour-long interview was conducted in English and Hindi. The transcript has been edited for purposes of space, but what is being published is a verbatim record of the conversation of Mr Deoras is a man of strong opinions, even prejudices, but the lasting impression was of a powerful man whose mind is made up but who needs to acquaint himself with other points of view. And, he was aware of this need.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: MRM, an affiliate of RSS, to campaign for Muslim women’s minimum marriage age

Naqvi: The communal riots on an unprecedented scale have broken out in various parts of the country. What role can the RSS play to control the situation? Is the situation out of control?

Deoras: Who are the people behind these communal riots? I am afraid that some political parties are playing a role. What I think is this. Mr V.P. Singh expected Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav to go with him. But ultimately Mr. Yadav went with Chandrashekhar. So, may be those who belong to the Janata Dal at present. Also Mr V.P. Singh has close contacts with the Imam. So there must be some political thinking behind this All of a sudden these riots have erupted. We have news that the Muslim pockets are having arms collecting arms and all that. I think the whole thing seems to have some plan and, ofcourse we shall have to meet this.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: The Kashmir Files – Bloodied and Gory, Sold out to RSS/BJP Agenda

Naqvi: Well, the popular perception is that this is the BJP and RSS plan to enlarge the Hindu constituency.

Deoras: I do not think that there should be any misconception about the BJP. They do not have any such big cadre or any preparation like that. So many people are being arrested in Aligarh and Hyderabad. No RSS member or Swayam Sevaks have been arrested on this account. If RSS people had a hand or the BJP would have hatched this plot, I think a lot of them would have been arrested. I think people pay some money to the goonda elements and manage. But there is a reaction among the Hindus. If it goes on and on, then the Hindus begin to react. Until now, Muslims have been appeased because they have got a block-vote. Now, the Hindus are  reacting against this appeasement. No appeasement, but justice to all.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Former RBI chief Raghuram Rajan invited by VHP to speak at World Hindu Congress in Chicago

Naqvi: What would have happened to the mosque?

Deoras: No Muslim goes to say his namaz there. All things which are around the mosque are all connected with Hindu sentiments.

Naqvi: Do you believe that because of the communal tension the Hindu mass is getting consolidated on the Ayodhya platform and in favour of the BJP?

Deoras: That is an important factor.

Naqvi: In other words, the benefits of the communal tension are going to the BJP? And he who benefits must have a hand in communal tension.

Deoras: I think Advaniji, by his Rath Yatra and the speeches he has given throughout the country, not a word in his lectures he has spoken that is anti-Muslim stance.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Champions of RSS, VHP Hindutva  Re-invent Themselves as Champions of Asian Americans in the US

Naqvi: But look at the slogans going on in Aligarh, in Hyderabad. You are aware of the poison of Ms Uma Bharati’s tapes. You know the kind of poison that is being spread is dividing the hearts and minds of the people. Are you going to sit back or avert another partition in the minds of the people?

Deoras: What about the speech Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav gave. I do not know about the Muslim leaders. The Babri Masjid Action Committee must have their tapes. They may be speaking. I do not know what is going on their minds.

Naqvi: Do the slogans contained in Ms Uma Bharati’s tapes offend you?

Deoras: I do not like it.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: India under Modi –declining in stature and headed towards it’s back to BJP/VHP/RSS etc.

Naqvi: Therefore, you should stand up and condemn the provocative slogans.

Deoras: I do not like the meanings behind the slogans. At present, just as no Muslim will like to make a statement, I will also not like to either.

Naqvi: You are circumventing my question, Sir? Are you willing to issue a statement condemning the communal riots and condemn provocative slogans?

Deoras: Both Hindus and Muslims should condemn together. Muslims had come here. It was I who arranged the meeting of Mr Javed Habib and some other people with the VHP. And the first meeting took place and they decided to meet again so that there should be understanding.

Naqvi: To change the subject do you endorse the two-nation theory on the basis of which Pakistan was found?

Also Read, Tweet & Share: RSS backed BJP Govt. builds its First Detention Camp for illegals, some workers fear detention there

Deoras: We never accepted it.

Naqvi: So it follows that you will not accept that Hindus and Muslims as two separate nations.

Deoras: We do not accept. It is one nation. From Kanyakumari to the Himalayas it is one nation.

Naqvi: You have not given up the agenda of  Akhand Bharat?

Deoras: We have not given up. If the time comes we shall do it. We shall ask the Muslims in Pakistan what have you gained? Muslims who went there from Bihar and UP – are they happy?

Naqvi: If you do not accept the two-nation theory then it follows that you accept the proposition that Hindu, Muslim, Sikh and Christians in India should all live together and prosper together. Since you are allergic to the term secular let us find another term-India’s composite culture.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Hindus for Human Rights and Chain Fast for Peace Start Navaratri Chain Fast in Support of Indian Socialist Party’s

Deoras: One culture – why do you say composite culture.

Naqvi: If you do not like the word “composite” also then as an adjustment I am willing to delete it. I said composite because various streams have contributed to Indian culture.

Deoras: Say Bharatiya culture.

Naqvi: OK, Bhartiya culture, Indian culture. There is a contradiction between your Akhand Bharat perspective and the Hindu Rashtra. Is there not a contradiction? Akhand Bharat is all embracing from Kanyakumari to the Himalayas, but Hindu Rashtra further sub-divides what we are left with.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Indian Diaspora becoming vanguards of assertive Hindutva

Deoras: Nation and state are two different concepts. States have equal rights, equal citizenship – that is the concept of state. This nation is not created by British or anything. It is there from a long time, from Rama from Krishna, thousands of years ago. The whole country had that concept of Rama, the concept of Krishna, the concept of Mahabharata etc. Anywhere you will find the same thing. That is the binding thing. Culture was the binding factor throughout the country. There may be some different kings, different rulers in the last 1000 years or something like that the foreigners came and all that.

Naqvi: You have glided past a very important detail. Did we become independent after 200 years of British rule or have we become free after 1000 years of foreign rule?

Also Read, Tweet & Share: “Jai Shri Ram”: Leicester Police Ineffective Because It Couldn’t Understand Slogan?

Deoras: I do not think that in many parts in our country Muslims really think that they were the rulers. There have been some Afghans, Turks and all those who came and invaded the country.  They came and ruled the country.

Naqvi: They came and settled here.

Deoras: But they came and ruled and changed many of our people. Those who were Hindus-you may say down-trodden something like that-they changed their faith and they became Muslims. If they go back seven generations behind probably they may say that they belong to this caste-they were Rajputs, they were this and that. So, they themselves know that they are Hindus and only in the last two or three generations they have become Muslims. But somehow, may be Britishers fortified this feeling. Muslims living in this country at present feel that they were the rulers of this land. Why should they have any connection with Babar. He came from Central Asia.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Naseer, Aamir Are Like “Traitors”, says RSS’ Indresh Kumar

Naqvi: Even your forefathers came from Central Asia-Aryans came from Central Asia?

Deoras: There is some controversy in this. That is now being contradicted. There are so many books contradicting this.

Naqvi: You mean Aryans did not come from anywhere?

Deoras: No we have not.

Naqvi: So they just happened here, they simply sprouted here?

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Modi is like a ‘scorpion sitting on a Shivaling’ for RSS: Shashi Tharoor at Bangalore litfest

Deoras: Yes. The term Aryans and Adivasis, what is all this. Britishers have created this. Arya means not a caste, Arya means noble. There are enough books with documents that we are the original people who have been living here. Aryan theory, Dravidian theory are all devised to break the Hindus.

Naqvi: Sir, if all the communities live and prosper together in India, then we constitute a threat to the basis of Pakistan. The success of Indian secularism is a threat to Pakistan which carne into being on the assumption that we can’t live together. Do you agree?

Deoras: I think Pakistan will go.

Naqvi: Let us go step by step (question is repeated)

Deoras: Bharat is alright. But as the things are going in Pakistan, they have defeated Ms. Benazir Bhutto. They are helping Khalistan elements in Punjab, the JKLF or whatever elements in Kashmir and all that. Unless this sort of government’ at the top goes in Pakistan, I think no change is possible at present. This will have to be changed.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Diversity, not Divisiveness is the goal for secular India

Naqvi: How do we change that?

Deoras: The Hindu leadership should come. I do not know what will happen in Bangladesh. Leadership may change. I think during this Ershad regime, I have got the latest report that 1100 temples have been destroyed. Hindus have come in Bengal. There are still Bengali Hindus.

I do not know when the elections are going to be held. Some Hindus in Bangladesh may fight elections. Very few of them will come. But suppose change comes in Bengal, tension will not be there and I think they can live in harmony. Then there is this poverty and other problems, and they may say that there is no use of remaining separate let us join together. And if that happens then I think the atmosphere may change. Sindhi people in Pakistan, and those who have gone from UP and Bihar. What have they gained? They are not liked there. So, if these movements gather strength and let us again work for one Bharat.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Five events in five days, exposing ‘Ram Rajya’ in Narendra Modi’s India

Naqvi: Sir, that is only possible if you and I live in harmony. But if we clash in Aligarh, Ahmedabad, Ayodhya then we are not a magnet. We are not attractive enough for them to imitate us. We are not setting the right example. On the contrary…

Deoras: Foreign powers are trying to create divisions and Muslims in major parts are playing into their hands. There has to be reform in Muslim society in India.

Naqvi: What about the Hindu society?

Deoras: There are regular movements of social reforms going on in Hindu society. But in the Muslim community, I do not find any movement. If somebody starts they are not liked by the community. They are being controlled by Mullahs.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Why India’s Majoritarian Reactionaries are Scared of Mughals?

Naqvi: Indian Muslims have a minority complex. Therefore, reform is even more difficult. The most backward Muslims in the world reside in India and by keeping them under pressure you are contributing to their backwardness.

Deoras: Who is keeping them backward?

Naqvi: We have got them involved in non-issues. You and I have all got them involved in Babri Masjid; they are involved in the Shah Bano case; they are supposed to be objecting to our relations with Israel. None of these are bread and butter issues. And you say they have been pampered. What have they got with all this so-called pampering.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: What is Muslim Community’s response to their looming Genocide

Deoras: Due to the minority complex you allow them to do anything?

Naqvi: What is the advantage Muslims have derived since Independence. Look at their economic conditions, look at the job quotas. OK, they got the Muslim Women’s Bill, but has one Muslim woman gained in real terms?

Deoras: They get minority rights; special rights in the Constitution.

Naqvi: Please answer my question. What have the Muslims gained?

Deoras: To appease Muslims, they have got a Minority Commission.

Naqvi: This is precisely what I am saying. These are hollow, insubstantial gifts. An impression has been created by all governments that there is something special going for the Muslims. But in essence they have got nothing, no jobs, no education, no businesses.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Permanent Conflict Toward Hindu Rashtra Or Peaceful Dialogue For Hindustan?

Deoras: There is no difference between Hindus and Muslims as regards poverty. As for the question of jobs, if you are capable for that post you will get it. There should be no distinction. Now the government comes out with Mandal Commission and it has created so many divisions in the country itself.

Naqvi: Do you think the whole Ayodhya agitation has been able to cement some of the divisions in the Hindu society that have been created by the Mandal Commission.

Deoras: A little bit definitely. Ram is not the God only for forward castes. He is the God for the entire community.

Naqvi: We have not spoken of Kashmir. How can we hope to keep Kashmir if a perception is created all over the world that we treat our Muslims shabbily?

Deoras: Do you think the Kashmiri Hindus who have become migrants in Jammu can go back?

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Fears Over The Rising Militant Hindutva Influence In US Politics

Naqvi: May be not, at this point. Again that Pakistan factor comes into play, Pakistani support for those elements who are creating the trouble. We have to handle the Pakistani factor by love and respect for each other in this country. Germanys were united because East Germans saw that life on the other side is better. Similarly, people in Bangladesh and Pakistan should say that life on the other side is better (many Pakistanis used to say this privately a few years ago). Now I feel embarrassed. I used to show off to my Pakistani friends-look at our composite culture, our freedom, our democracy. But look at the mess now. And you must take your share of the blame, Sir.

Deoras: There is no difference between Hindus and Muslims as regards poverty. Communalism is not the only factor. There are a lot of tensions among the Hindus also. We can work together to see that everybody, whether Muslim or Hindu, gets bread two times a day.

Naqvi: By your logic you are coming around to my view. Bring down the communal temperature, generate love and caring, not hatred. They are making bombs in every Mohalla, neighbourhood. This is what we are reducing our country to-a cottage industry of illicit arms.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: The Making of ‘Hindu Rashtra’ : Dakshin Karnataka

Deoras: They are selling it. This is business.

Naqvi: Unless you give a call, this will only go on.

Deoras: Let us, you and I together, give the call to the country.

Naqvi: It is fine with me. Let’s shake hands on that. But please convince your rank and file that it is in Pakistan’s interest that Hindus and Muslims fight each other in this country. This is my entire thesis. During my visit to Aligarh I saw two bombs were dropped in a mosque and two similar type of bombs were dropped in a Hindu locality.

Deoras: Some Muslims must have dropped it.

Naqvi: I like the abruptness with which you have come to this conclusion. OK, but who are these Muslims?

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Ending Temple Politics Will Help Harmonize But Pakistan The Cornerstone

Deoras: When something happens in Pakistan why should there be a reaction here. When Bhutto was hanged-(it has got nothing to do with us). There were demonstrations in Kashmir and trouble in all other places.

Naqvi: What has that got to do with Babar. You yourself agree that Pakistan was unnatural. Then you expect Indian Muslims and for that matter even Hindus to have an unnatural hatred towards Pakistanis.

Deoras: We need a great national reconciliation on the basis of understanding, good humour. All the Muslims who are getting elected to parliament and the assemblies belong to the fundamentalist variety. This is the problem.

Naqvi: Not all leaders, but yes, there is the problem of Muslim leadership. There is no doubt about it.

Deoras: Why don’t you try and create that leadership. Just like you. Why don’t you be a leader.

Naqvi: Zahid e Tang nazar ne mujhe kafir jaana: Aur Kafir yeh samajhta hai Mussalman hum main (The Kafir thinks I am a Muslim and the Mullah thinks I am a Kafir)

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Kashi, Mathura Mosques, Private Grief of Muslims, Not The World’s Concern

Deoras: (Laughs heartily) I have close contacts with the BJP. I do not know the exact figure but for kar sewa a number of Muslims have joined. What I am trying to say is we are ready to take Muslims with us. They can join the BJP.

Naqvi: You have also betrayed the same old attitude, the same complaint. Indian Muslims identity with Babar and Indonesian Muslims identify with Ram.

Deoras: It is important that Muslims identify with Ram as an Indian symbol.

Naqvi: I throw a challenge to you about this Ram and Babar comparison. I recite numerous couplets written by Muslim poets in praise of Ram and in praise of Krishna. I throw a challenge to you. You show me one line in praise of Babar written by a Muslim poet. If you show me one couplet I will change my faith. This Babar business is a canard. There are any number of Muslim rulers, poets, philosophers who contemplated Hinduism with great admiration, its philosophy, its aesthetic range. Someone like Dara Shikoh. Now Hindus must accept him as a hero. I am asking you. Is Dara Shikoh acceptable to you?

Deoras: He is a hero. But the Muslim community did not permit him to live.

Naqvi: I am taking you on record that Dara Shikoh is your model for a good Muslim and a model Indian.

Deoras: I have not read his whole life. But it is true. He was a fine gentleman. He translated the Upanishads. But remember he was not allowed to rule this land. The establishment was against him.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Imran Khan, the modern-day Aristotle, the Philosopher King

Naqvi: What is your last word for national reconciliation?

Deoras: At present, Ram mandir should be allowed to be built. We accept Dara Shikoh as an Indian hero; you accept Ram as part of our common cultural heritage.

Naqvi: Who can dispute that Rama is part of our cultural heritage. Our poets have written about him.

Deoras: Let the temple be built first. I will be the first person who will say let us forget the past.

Naqvi: Sir, if I get you right, what you are saying is that if the Ram mandir is allowed to be built then you will come out openly and say that let bygones be bygones. All the structures, monuments will remain intact exactly as they were in 1947 or 1950.

Deoras: I am ready to say once the construction of the Ram Temple takes place-It will take a long time-it will be one of the biggest temples. I know the demand of VHP is three sites-Mathura and Kashi Vishwanath.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: VHP activists protest at Taj Mahal, seek removal of gate blocking temple path

Naqvi: You will prevail upon them to give up claim on the other two?

Deoras: I cannot say they will accept. But I will try. Let this Ram temple be built first and start national reconciliation. Let us not go to the government. Let us sit together and solve the problem.

Naqvi: For that you have to issue a whip to your cadres. Let there be peace.

Deoras: I promise you, we do not like what is going on.

Naqvi: You condemn the violence?

Deoras: Yes. of course. These riots create a bad image throughout the world. I do not like it. I want every Muslim to live here in peace. He has got equal rights. But just because he is a Muslim he should not demand something separate from others. Civil rights and other things, everything is common. They should mentally prepare for this. No special status. No minority preferences. They do not have one language. Urdu is not a Muslim language. It is a common language for so many people.

Naqvi: Do you think Urdu should be taught at school and encouraged in everyway?

Deoras: Of course. If people want they should be able to learn it. We are not saying all these cultural things should be thrown out.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: Walk Of The Dispossessed In India & Race Riots In US

Naqvi: Do you share the vision of a confederation covering Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka-without prejudice to their sovereignty.

Deoras: This is an excellent political concept. Just like Europe. Have something in common, build common bridges, common bridges with Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Nepal.

Naqvi: This can happen only when there is peace in our country.

Deoras: Unless there is peace nothing can happen. Peace is the fundamental condition for solving all the problems of the country.

Naqvi: So you will use your influence asking your cadres to maintain peace?

Deoras: Yes, but you have to speak to Muslim society also.

Naqvi: Sir, you are also using Ram Janmbhoomi for political purposes.

Deoras: Everything will be alright. Let this temple be built. Let Muslims help us build it.

Naqvi: But the condition is peaceful settlement so that this temple to Ram is also a temple to peace.

Also Read, Tweet & Share: New political culture has made India a moving anarchy

Deoras: Peace should be there. It is important for Muslims to maintain peace. They rush to the government and political leaders. They have to live with Hindus, particularly the younger generation. They have to make some sentimental adjustment.

Also, Read more from this Author: In the Aftermath of Moradabad Riots

Articles written by contributors have different viewpoints. The views expressed in the articles are the author’s own and not necessarily supported by TIO, The India Observer its affiliates, staff, or the management. Our Articles can be reproduced, with the following conditions, (1) No alteration to the content, (2) Visible, and full credit is given to the Author & Editor. (3) Citing, The India Observer, TIO. In the case of online or electronic media, a link to the original article must be given. Rules are strictly enforced. Any questions, email the Editor at: Or

All Copyrights reserved. Please be guided.

Saeed Naqvi

Saeed Naqvi

Saeed Naqvi is a senior Indian journalist, television commentator, interviewer. He has interviewed world leaders and personalities in India and abroad, which appear in newspapers, magazines and on national television, remained editor of the World Report, a syndication service on foreign affairs, and has written for several publications, both global and Indian, including the BBC News, The Sunday Observer, The Sunday Times, The Guardian, Washington Post, The Indian Express, The Citizen and Outlook magazine. At the Indian Express, he started in 1977 as a Special Correspondent and eventually becoming, editor, Indian Express, Madras, (1979–1984), and Foreign Editor, The Indian Express, Delhi in 1984, and continues to writes columns and features for the paper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *